Sir Shannon Scott Williams
Microeconomics
Unit 3: Individual Project
Production and Perfect Competition
American InterContential University, Online
January 21th, 2011
Abstract
When it comes to production, units produced per day consist of many factors in order to create a good. Labor, electricity, training, repair, and other necessary cost are examples to these factors. In order for a facility to remain in production, revenue must be greater than the cost per day or else the business is at a loss, most likely end in shut down. In this paper, there is a given scenario where a plant is facing a loss in daily revenue due to exceeding cost. To determine whether or not the plant should shut down or continue production, readers will be able to understand the calculations to make these decisions.
In the given scenario there is a plant that employer’s 50,000 workers who produce 200,000 units per day. The cost of each daily wage per worker is $80. Units produced generates the plant $25 per unit. To operate under these conditions, there are other variable inputs totaling $400,000 per day. Another cost, fixed cost, which is unknown, it causing the plants total cost to exceed total revenue per day. To determine whether or not the plant should shut down, or continue to operate, you are to assume a fixed cost of $1 million and $3 million. The calculations provided will determine shut down or continuing production.
To begin with, you need to understand that if Total Revenue (TR) is greater than Total Costs (TC) then the plant can continue production. However, if TR is less than TC, then shut down production.
The first calculation is to discover the Total Revenue being generated per day. You know that the employees produce 200,000 units where each unit sells for $25. So multiply total units by sale price.
Total Revenue (TR) = 200,000 x $25 = $5,000,000 per day.
Next, determine the Total Cost; however you do not know what the total fixed cost, so base the determination on Total Variable Costs.
Total Variable Cost (TVC) is equal to the total number of workers (50,000) multiply by the daily wage of each worker ($80) plus other variable costs ($400,000).
Total Variable Cost (TVC) = (50,000 x $80) + $400,000 = $4,400,000
Based on these calculations for Total Revenue and Total Variable Costs, it is clear that the plant generates enough revenue to cover the various costs. Since the plant is able to cover its cost and continue production.
TR $5 million/per day > TVC $4,400,000/per day = Continue production
However the Fixed Costs are not implemented into this determination, so you need to assume on two different occasions that the fixed costs are $1 million per day and $3 million per day. This input will ultimately decide whether or not to shut down or continue production.
Let us assume first that the Fixed Cost is $1 million per day. The Total Variable Cost (TVC) will remain unchanged for this calculation, number of employees (50,000) multiply by daily wage ($80) then add various input costs ($400,000).
Total Variable Cost (TVC) = (50,000 x $80) + $400,000 = $4,400,000
Next the Average Variable Cost (AVC) which is equal to the Total Variable Cost ($4.4 million) divided by the total units of output per day (200,000).
Average Variable Cost (AVC) = $4,400,000 / 200,000 = 22
Next, the Average Total Cost (ATC) which are equal to the Total Variable Costs ($4.4 million) plus the Total Fixed Cost ($1 million), then divided by the units of output per day (200,000).
Average Total Cost (ATC) = ($4,400,000 + $1,000,000) / 200,000 = 27
Finally there is Worker Productivity (WP) which is equal to the total units of output per day (200,000) divided by the total number of employees (50,000).
Worker Productivity (WP) = 200,000 / 50,000 = 4
Assuming that the Total Fixed Cost is $3 million per day, you will use the same calculations as before to determine plant shutdown or continuing production.
Total Variable Cost (TVC) = (50,000 x $80) + $400,000 = $4,400,000
Average Variable Cost (AVC) = $4,400,000 / 200,000 = 22
Average Total Cost (ATC) = ($4,400,000 + $3,000,000) / 200,000 = 37
Worker Productivity (WP) = 200,000 / 50,000 = 4
Since you have assumed the Fixed Cost, you can now calculate Total Cost in which you take the TVC and add the Fixed Cost.
Assuming the Fixed Cost for $1 million:
Total Cost = TVC + Fixed Cost = $4,400,000 + $1,000,000 = $5,400,000
Assuming the Fixed Cost for $3 million:
Total Cost = TVC + Fixed Cost = $4,400,000 + $3,000,000 = $7,400,000
The result is a higher cost than revenue being generated; Profit or Loss details the result by taking the TR minus the TC.
Profit or Loss ($1million) = $5,000,000 - $5,400,000 = -$400,000 loss each day.
Profit or Loss ($3million) = $5,000,000 - $7,400,000 = -$2,400,000 loss each day.
The loss is due to the ATC being higher than the AVC. The plants units sell for $25 each. If the plant operates on TVC, it can generate profit based on the AVC ($22/unit), a $3 gain. However, if the Fixed Cost is added, this results an ATC increasing the price cost. At $1million Fixed Cost, the ATC per unit is $27, a $2 loss. At $3 million Fixed Cost, the ATC per unit is $37, a $10 loss.
Based on the assumption for a Fixed Cost of $1 million, these costs are exceeding daily revenue. The plant could shut down temporary or lay-off some of its employees to reach a break-even-price, whenever price equals minimum average, (Krugan, Wells, 2009, p. 340). Issuing a lay-off, you first need to calculate Profit or Loss then divide by daily wage to determine how many employees need to be laid off.
Lay-off = ($5,000,000 - $5,400,000) / $80 = -5000 employees
Since 5,000 employees are to be laid-off, this will change the daily production. Going back to the Worker Productivity formula, you calculate the change.
Worker Productivity = 200,000 / 45,000 = 4.44
As you can see the change in units produced is increased because the new work force has to make-up for laid-off employees. This isn’t much work to be made up, so this would be the best option for the plant under the conditions of a Fixed Cost for $1million.
Assuming the Fixed Cost for $3 million:
Total Cost = $4,400,000 + $3,000,000 = $7,400,000
In this assumption, the Total Cost highly exceeds Total Revenue and must face an immediate shut down.
TR < TC = $5,000,000 < $7,400,000 = Immediate shut down
A lay-off would not be an option due to the amount make-up work needed from employees. The new productivity is more than double the amount.
Lay-off = ($5,000,000 - $7,400,000) / $80 = -30,000 employees
Worker Productivity = 200,000 / 20,000 = 10
In conclusion, the scenario is an example of what many plants face whenever costs exceed revenue. As for this situation, the plant can operate for a short time with minor lay-offs only with a Fixed Cost of $1 million. It is unfortunate how the fate of the plant must cease production with the Fixed Cost for $3 million. From calculation to calculation, you should now be able to determine a similar situation if ever encountered.
References:
Armstrong, Kotler. (2009). Introduction to Marketing (9th Ed.).
Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Friday, February 11, 2011
//
Labels:
microeconomics,
perfect competition,
production
//
35
comments
//
35 comments to "Production and Perfect Competition pt 2 microeconomics"
More Economy information
Labels
aiu
(1)
chickens
(1)
concepts
(2)
consumption of goods
(1)
distrubution
(1)
economics
(4)
management
(1)
market systems
(2)
microeconomics
(5)
monopolies
(2)
natural
(2)
part 1
(1)
per se
(2)
perfect competition
(2)
potatoes
(1)
production
(3)
pure
(2)
scootland
(1)
services
(1)
Economist
About This Blog
This blog is my effort to try and share my knowledge and understanding of economics.
If you stick around, you are guaranteed to learn something about analyzing the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services.
Popular Posts
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams Microeconomics Unit 4: Individual Project Pure, Per Se and Natural Monopolies American InterContential Univ...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams January 24 th , 2010 ECON220 Unit 3: Discussion Board Pure, Per Se and Natural Monopolies Importin...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams Microeconomics Unit 1: Individual Project Economic Concepts American InterContential University, Onlin...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams Microeconomics Unit 3: Individual Project Production and Perfect Competition American InterContential Univer...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams Microeconomics Unit 2: Individual Project Microeconomics and Market Systems American InterContential Uni...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams January 10 th , 2010 ECON220 Unit 2: Discussion Board Microeconomics and Market Systems The winte...
-
As an asset management contractor, fulfilling clients demands are very specific and technical due to the expectation. When clients ...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams January 17 th , 2010 ECON220 Unit 3: Discussion Board Production And Perfect Competition When I th...
-
Sir Shannon Scott Williams December 30, 2010 ECON220 Unit 1: Discussion Board Economic Concepts A time ago, around 2008, I m...
-
Innovation is define by a product of means to which it introduces a breakthrough in performance, quality, price, and gener...
Unknown says:
This is why you find a lot of workers who have been in plants like this for 5 years or less. Businesses under this scenario, unless growing rapidly, can't afford to pay their workers cost-of-living increases, which are mandatory in some areas. They would rather 'hit the reset button' and start with a new employee at the bottom-tier wage, to keep their overhead low.
Nothing personal, it's just business....
The Facts of Vidya says:
Bloody complex stuff there! Thanks for sharing
Improve your Vocab! says:
good stuff here! i've got a friend studying economics at edinburgh uni, who i'm sure will find this interesting.
Alaeron says:
you are welcome sis
remember: perfect competition only exists in books!
Public Confessions says:
business is sad
come support yourself at -> Motivational confessions
Doc_Waffles says:
business is sad indeed. good info though.
Zakk says:
very informative. Businesses need to do whats in their best interests.
erics says:
i haven't seen that many numbers since calculus, which was a very long time ago.
Stuff that matters, stuff that don't says:
Way over my head. Businesses shouldn't have such an influence on politicians IMO.
Anonymous says:
I didn't read through it all yet. But since I'm studying journalism economics is getting quite importan. So I want to thank you for your efforts! I hope this can help me :0)
Linux says:
Interesting
metalpark_73189 says:
Thanks for the info =)
Matt Alexander says:
This makes me semi-excited to be taking Economics next year.
Followed!
dudebro24.blogspot.com
G says:
This was always my problems with investing - too many calculations
shadi says:
thank you for sharing this post.followed
Kugy says:
sweetness! i will def be looking at this more! followed
Skimbosh says:
Umm, holy stat sheet Batman. I'm afraid I can't make heads or tails out of all that.
My bad.
Layman Researcher says:
Wow, much respect for economists
Bobby Jenkins says:
nice post... cant wait for more... followed
Bart says:
woooo entertaining...
GamerGanz says:
Why do I feel sad for understanding most of this?
givemegames321 says:
YAYYYYY thankyouy
Sean says:
Ohhhh.... numbers! Crazy read! Makes sense if you think about it hard enough, though.
Follow and contribute!
http://garagezoku.blogspot.com
Bring_Napkins says:
Good stuff, reading microeconomics is always interesting
Bassislv says:
nice post, but I think this is too complex to me,
Innovations says:
:[ so confusing
'Auana says:
Hate economics... i dont understand it... thats why im an Engineer lol...
Maarten Sukel says:
hehe, my teacher economics didnt understand.
Benduffrulez says:
sounds pretty legit to me...nice post!
ootori says:
Yeah, the truth is that most companies are more willing to hire people with less education now, because then they don't have to pay them as much as people who have more education and /or experience. It's all about the money...
ipiliviensomewhere.blogspot.com
Anonymous says:
Whoa, lots of reading there!
FTW says:
Hey its quite interesting =) had to read it two times to understand but good informations thx
1904 Blogger says:
interesting stuff dude
Isaac says:
What is this I don't even... :(
PekkaK says:
Business and politics don't mix